Supernova Interview with Scott Draves

I work with the artist Scott Draves (AKA Spot), who makes art using the network as a medium.  I also work with Kevin Werbach and Jeannie Logozzo (captured by Renee Blodgett) of the Supernova conference, and 2008's theme is Challenges for the Network Age. 

So when the time came to post interesting interviews to Supernova's Conversation Hub blog, it seemed like a no-brainer to pick Scott as my first interview (Esther Dyson is next week).

The interview, "Scott Draves on the Electric Sheep Network" is now up on the Supernova Conversation Hub blog

My favorites from the points Scott raised in the interview: 

  • that working with a network has its challenges but the reward is beyond compare
  • that art and open-source technology, being built upon the concepts that preceded them, are part of a "web of ideas" which is itself a network
  • that he is basing his career as an artist on the symbiotic relationship between free products for the crowd and limited-edition fine art for collectors

Scott Draves illustrates what happens when an open-source programmer becomes an artist.  He has brought open-source business models and open-source creative methodology to art, and the combination has stunning results.  (And I'm not saying that because I work with him; I work with him because I think that.  So does Siggraph, apparently, as they chose Draves' artwork as the brand identity for their 2008 conference, "Evolve").

Scott Draves Contemporary Art Dreams in High Fidelity

Google: Evil OK, in China

Cross-posted at the Supernova Conversation Hub:

Google is bringing the issue of protecting human rights at the cost of the company's market share to a shareholder vote - as reported by Joseph Hunkins at WebGuild.  The two proposals up for a vote are that Google would strictly control censorship and data sharing to protect human rights, and that Google would establish a Human Rights Committee to monitor these issues.  Google recommends no to both proposals, and they'll be able to point to the fact that their shareholders voted these proposals down as an excuse for not doing them.

The approach is an attempt to justify Google's capitulation to anti-democratic policy from countries like China - behavior that they've been called to task for engaging in because of their "do no evil" mantra.  The sad thing, to me, is that giving a question like this to shareholders: "Should we do the right thing even though it means making less money?" is giving it to the wrong party to decide.  Shareholders don't say no to profits. 

It's the users who should be asked, and the users who can decide to abandon the Google ship if they see objectionable, hypocritical behavior.  Insofar as a choice to deny human rights may alienate Google users, the stock prices could fall on a "no" vote -- but most of the time issues like human rights in far-away countries can't compete with great technology and brand.  An effective boycott is unlikely, a yes vote is unlikely.  Perhaps "do no evil" and "make money in China" are fundamentally incompatible.  Perhaps a mantra change to "do no evil except in countries led by repressive dictators" is in order?

Best Revenge Song Ever?

I was in the post office yesterday and heard Carly Simon's wonderful "You're So Vain" (Pity about the shoulder pads in this video - I think her big smile is really cute at the end). 

It struck me what a great classic relationship revenge song this is, and made me wonder about other revenge songs.  "I had some dreams they were clouds in my coffee" is a particularly poignant commentary on love gone wrong.  And "you're with some underworld spy or the wife of a close friend" is so harsh!  I love how the bitterness contrasts with the happy-go-lucky upbeat tune.

So then I got to thinking about the totally rocking "Song for the Dumped", the first Ben Folds song I heard at Brownie's in the early 90's when he was still playing to small crowds and jumping all over the piano (Mark Bonasera where are you now?).  A completely different style but it is also a potential winner.

When I surfed YouTube this morning to find a fitting tribute for a friend's 50th birthday, I knew I was on a roll and would have to blog about revenge songs. I found this song this guy wrote "for" his ex-wife on the occasion of her 50th and laughed until I cried.  Not at his lyrics but at his performance (sorry dude).  Listening to it again I am already giggling.  It only takes about 30 seconds to get the picture, but there is a nice bonus lyric at the very end if you have the stamina.

I'm sure all three of these targets have heard the song that was written for them and had that feeling that we all know they should have had.

Send in your favorites and I'll make a top ten list.

I'm blogging for Supernova

I've been doing some posting at Supernova's Conversation Hub lately, and I'll be doing some more over time.  I'll try to post reminders here but you might want to subscribe to that RSS if you don't want to miss a beat.

The Supernova conference, June 16-18 in San Francisco, has been one of my personal favorites for years, and this year I'm working with them.  I highly recommend you register now, before the prices go up.

My Conversation Hub posts so far this year:

http://conversationhub.com/2008/03/11/will-aggregated-social-graph-mean-privacy-violations/

http://conversationhub.com/2008/03/10/more-apres-mixer-posts/

http://conversationhub.com/2008/03/09/last-weeks-mixer-an-inspiring-conversation-starter/

http://conversationhub.com/2008/03/06/supernova-mixer-tonight-in-san-francisco/


Disillusionment

This is so sad.  If you can't trust Eliot Spitzer to be an honest politician, I don't think you can really trust anyone anymore.  He did so much for Wall Street, and for New York.

I don't really get why prostitution is illegal, and I don't think public figures should lose their careers over their consensual sexual behavior.  However, in this particular case, like in the recent Larry Craig scandal, the unforgiveable hypocrisy is the problem, not the action itself.

I've always thought of Spitzer as the king of clean.  I guess it is always the ones who protest the most who have the most to hide.  Sigh.

Two Different Viewpoints

I really liked Chris Carfi's post yesterday.  David Cushman is in the market for a car and has used his blog to invite someone to sell him one.  Chris picked up on this and used it to write a little lesson about how businesses should think about marketing.

Chris' point: while companies are focusing on their viewpoint, customers are focused on theirs, and the two aren't really meshing.

My take on this is that in the past, customers probably had to flex a little bit and see things from the vendor's point of view, and vendors got spoiled and started, foolishly, to insist on this.  I relayed a story about a case like this, also involving a car sale, a few months ago.

These days, the balance has shifted to put the power into the hands of the customer.  This is what Cluetrain is all about.  So companies are focused on Selling; they Market because they have discovered it helps with sales; and they Support because they have to, it helps with sales, and it's an extra revenue stream.  End of story, right?

Wrong.  As Chris points out, these three functions are the flip side of what the customer is doing:
- Search (Marketing is supposed to reach the customer during this stage)
- Shop (Sales supposed to kick in here)
- Help (Support supposed to address this need)

Chris' view is that the vendors are in a "transactional mindset", and if they had a "relationship" with the customer they'd have David's business already.  The reason this is true is because if more companies saw the need to maintain a connection with their customers even when their customers weren't in the process of buying something, they'd have a good way to ask their customers for referrals. 

In particular, referrals could be incentivized - and although many businesses do this, many more that could do not.  If I could make $1K by reading David's blog and telling my auto dealer about him, I'd be on the phone to my dealer right now.  Or even if I weren't compensated - if I just had a friendship, or if I'd gotten a referral from that auto dealer for my business and owed him one.  There are lots of ways to build a relationship.

High-end, high-touch businesses do this as a matter of course, but thanks to the Internet (and no so incidentally tools like Chris Carfi's cerado, now everybody can do it.

Why I love Russ Nelson

Ever seen a corporate environment that praises the concept of "outside the box" thinking, but punishes the practice of "outside the box" thinking?

I have seen lots of this, and I'm convinced it's because most people don't think outside the box, and most people like to hang out with people who think like they think.  It can be so annoying to try to smooth over those rough spots caused by our differences, can't it?

I was reading danah boyd's blog today (yeah, it happens) which includes a brief and passionate analysis of why she has settled on Obama instead of Clinton, based on who would be the better president.  The comment section includes praise from fans of both camps.  And then Russ Nelson weighs in.  Russ says,

"The issue here is not getting the right person in office -- it's making it less crucial to have the right person in office."

Russ is a Libertarian and he recommends less concentration of power in Washington and more distribution of power to the states.

I used to work with someone who once complained that I brought up topics that were "orthogonal" to the discussion.  "Orthogonal" literally means "at right angles to" and figuratively means "not pertinent to the matter under consideration" (WordNet).  Russ' comment was orthogonal to the conversation who makes a better president, Barack or Hillary (he backs Ron Paul). 

Orthogonal comments are literally "impertinent".  They can be annoying.  They are also the hallmark of the "outside the box" thinker, and so much more interesting than the same old debate.  I love that Russ thinks like this.  I think there are lots more who do, and who keep their mouths shut in the corporate environment.  They keep their mouths shut because they've suffered unpleasant consequences from opening them.  As have I, as has Russ.

Russ, thanks for sharing your orthogonal opinions.  I don't find them impertinent at all.

Someone Sent Soap

So I got a little present in the mail a couple of days ago, a small forest green box, and inside nestled in purple tissue were four pretty bars of handmade soap from Voda (via eBay) -- the Laksmi box set, named for the Hindu goddess of abundance (Thanks!).  Five travel-size soaps were included as well; they have names like "Eastern Beauty" (Ok, I can see that, and thank you again!) and "Moroccan Love" (Less obvious how that fits in).  No "from" name was enclosed.  A mystery gift.

My first thought, since I am well-brought-up, was that I needed to blog this because I had to send a thank you note and didn't know who to send it to.  Perhaps the vendor simply forgot to include the sender's name, in error.  Then I would be on the hook for never sending the thank you note! Thanks for the nice gift, Anonymous!  Phew, got that out of the way.

My second thought was - what a clever way to get a bunch of people to blog about you.  Just find the addresses of some people who blog and send them something anonymously.  The chances that they wouldn't blog about it must be close to zero - I mean, we don't get anonymous gifts every day!  Is this one of the most innovating word of mouth marketing schemes yet?  Will the marketers follow up with a mysterious valentine in two weeks, and then reveal themselves dramatically in March?

Then I had a horrible thought.  Is someone trying to tell me that I am stinky, and that I need fragrant soaps to clean me up?  I have never been much for wearing special scents.  Either the person who sent these soaps didn't know that, or that's exactly what they did know, and they took issue with it. What better way to say, in the gentlest most friendly way, that your friend needs to boost her AQ (aromatic quotient) than by sending some fragrant handmade soaps?

This is the down side of sending an anonymous present.  The recipient may read into it something unintended.  I find myself wondering if the person who sent these soaps is the same person who sent, about 5-6 years ago, a large columnar floor lamp with a motorized spinning disk that changed the ambient light in the room from green to red to blue to yellow in cycles.  I wracked my brains.  Was someone trying to tell me something about my chameleon nature?   Accusing me of featuring a too-traditional decor in my apartment?  Complimenting my fun-loving psychedelic personality?

I figure now is a good time to let eager anonymous gift-givers know about my Amazon wish list.  Yes, my birthday is coming up in 3 weeks.  Nothing on there really excites me, but at least I won't wonder about motive.

Nobody ever claimed responsibility for sending the lamp.  It didn't match my lifestyle and I gave it away.  I'm going to use the soaps though.  They're a much smaller commitment, and I like them.  If the next time you see me I smell like "Nurture", you'll know why.

Measuring Social Media Success - an Interview

Yesterday, I conducted an interview and conversation as part of our Facebook Marketing 2.0 Group.  Although the interview was originally scheduled to be with Katie Paine of KDPaine & Partners, we ended up speaking with a methodologist from her team, Peter Kowalski, as Katie was pulled unexpectedly into moderating a meeting of her own at the last minute.

The audio from the 55-minute call is located here and can also be found (along with some comments from conference call participants) on the Facebook event listing.  The conference call - which was extremely well-attended - just begins to scratch the surface of the rich topic of how to measure the success of your social network or social media campaign.  This is a topic that I hope I will be able to come back to again and again, because I know there is a lot of interest.

Among other things, KDPaine and Partners looks at the placement of where and how people are talking about a company, before and after a social media campaign. Peter's tips included

1) Setting clear objectives prior to the campaign
2) Being precise about your definitions - saying you want more "engagement" is not enough; what does "engagement" mean?
3) Trying to integrate your measurement work with other research work done within the company, including integrating with other marketing and media metrics. 

He stressed that simply counting eyeballs or clicks -- the basic measurement that most folks do -- is just not good enough.  Proper measurement of social media means measuring connections and relationships. 
Social Media maven Howard Greenstein was kind enough to take notes on the call and summarize the content for us at the end.  He's also threatened to blog about the conversation at http://howardgreenstein.com/blog/.

Don't Give Up on Vista

On the front page of the New York Times website this morning was a banner ad that I just had to click: "Don't Give Up on Vista", it said.  Could Microsoft actually have resorted to begging?

Of course not.  Clicking on the ad sends you straight to Apple's site for Mac OS X Leopard Guided Tour.

I think this is the funniest banner ad I have seen in a long time.  Go Apple!

Dont_give_up_vista

Damning with False Praise

Maybe everyone is rebelling against the fact that it is, to quote a friend, "so slow it makes you say 'Damn!'".  Maybe they're furious about the built-in copyright protections.  Perhaps the marketplace just wasn't ready to update all their hardware to 2GB of memory.  Or maybe corporations are just tired of being held hostage by a monopolistic vendor.  Whatever the reason, people don't like Microsoft's new Vista operating system and their conversation is being overheard:

"For a limited time Lenovo is providing Windows XP Recovery CD media as a way to downgrade from Windows Vista. Lenovo customers that have Windows Vista Business or Windows Vista Ultimate "qualified systems" may purchase a Windows XP Recovery CD until July 31, 2008".

Yikes!  It doesn't get any worse than that!  Lenovo is also releasing brand-new ThinkPad laptops preloaded with Windows XP.  Hmm, Microsoft, where do you get your early adopters when you've alienated all your early adopters?

What's worse than this?  Lenovo advertising for Windows on their ecommerce site: "Lenovo Recommends Windows Vista Business".  If you don't recommend it, folks, then don't recommend it, OK?

Lenovo_vista_3

(Via Slashdot via Russ Nelson).

Why You Should Hire Real Social Media Experts

You don't have to have been involved for long in the social media movement to have heard the single most important piece of advice anyone in the know can give you: BE TRANSPARENT(pointing to JD Lasica for this since he knows of what he speaks - but I could point to any true expert saying the same thing). 

And yet, newbie agencies that are advising corporations on their social media campaigns are still ignoring this very important rule. 

The latest in the series is New York Agency drillTeam's horrific advice to members of Target's word of mouth fanclub, Rounders.  Fans were asked to promote Target on Facebook but "keep it like a secret" that they were part of a group that was compensated for their efforts.  (Since this issue is what basically killed WOMMA's credibility, they're fighting it tooth and nail now, and recently included it in their newsletter).

Why is this BE TRANSPARENT rule so important in social media?  For two reasons.

  • Because the truth will come out when people talk about you -- that's how social media works. Unlike traditional media, individuals are not dependent on your goodwill to make their living, so they're not afraid to out you. 
  • Because, thanks to insincerity, traditional marketing has lost so much credibility that you're now turning to social marketing for help.  So don't ruin social marketing too - then what will you do to get the word out?

I've said this before: When you hire your social media consultants, make sure you are hiring people who have actually been working with online communities and user-generated content for awhile, and not people new to the "social" scene, whose real experience base lies in corporate messaging, "interactive", or online publishing.  You may think that a company like drillTeam, with clients like Toyota, Nestle and Nike, can't steer you wrong.  You may be instinctively afraid of hiring someone with a background at a bunch of user-driven startups with no blue chip clients.  But this is a new frontier -- the experienced pioneers will be better at showing you the route.

Here's a piece of free advice for Target: Add "Always disclose that you're part of this group when you recommend us" to your "code of conduct".  Oh yeah - and fire drillTeam.

Raph Koster Rocks the House

So I'm talking to Raph Koster during lunch at the Futures of Entertainment conference.  His Areae is cranking, and the beta of his new metaplace is on track for a January release.  Areae has made an easy-to-use virtual world interface - the Blogger or Typepad of virtual worlds,as he put it. (He's on a panel about Fan Labor later this afternoon.)

So who comes up to him and says "I am a huge fan" but Jesse Alexander.

That's so cool.

Futures of Entertainment

I’m blogging the (second annual) futures of entertainment conference put on by the MIT convergence culture consortium.  We started with opening comments from Henry Jenkins and Joshua Green.  Then things got into full swing with the first panel, on Mobile Media.

The first person on the panel was Alice Kim, Senior Vice President of Digital distribution and Partner Relations from MTV Networks; then Marc Davis, Social Media Guru from Yahoo; Anmol Madan, a PhD candidate at the MIT Media Lab, and Bob Schukai, Vice President of Wireless and Broadband Technologies from Turner Broadcasting.

Bob was by far the most interesting speaker on this panel as far as I was concerned – he’s clearly very expertly steeped in what he does, and has some interesting perspectives that are much less carrier-protective than what you might expect from someone who spent 18 years working at Motorola.

I’ll append some notes here, and some of my own commentary.  I usually refer to the person by their company name – this isn’t to imply that this is the corporate perspective, since it’s the individual who said it.  Mistakes are my own.

Marc Davis:  “what we used to call garage cinema we now call social media”.

Bob Schukai: The us is falling way behind the rest of the world technologically, used to be the leader in broadband and mobile. 100megs is the norm in hong kong, we struggle to get 3 megs. We’re 2 yrs behind Europe and 3-4 years behind Asia.  Views it as an opportunity to  “learn, translate and catch up.”

Moderator: how did we get so slow?

Bob: when digital cellular was launching, we didn’t have a standard. Let the best tech win.  7 different standards and a patchwork standards.  People are putting skype on phones and breaking business models. But people are willing to go try different things, and we dropped the ball.

Isabel: (Obviously I’m not talking during the panel- I’m just presenting my perspective): But what about the monopoly land line companies, working hard not to cannibalize their existing revenue streams and moving as slow as molasses? How much blame do they deserve?

MTV: OK, we agree standards and business models are an issue. How do we provide our content and raise the discovery for our users?  Consumer behavior isn’t there yet to watch video on mobile.  Let’s make the experience easier to access for the masses.

Turner.  We want to drive really cool content on the networks.  When you have 4-5 people running slingbox simultaneously, it can break the cell tower.  Infrastructure is built for coverage, not quantity.

Yahoo: carriers have a monopoly on paid instant messaging.  Paying for that way instead of with ads. (He sounds jealous).

Yahoo – the whole concept of having social media on a phone is you can connect to anyone on any network.  So the walled garden model will have to come down.

Bob in the content space we know the walls are coming down, there are “off-set “ plays.
Media lab guy: learning from the open source movement, it’s some 17 year old from Finland who will come up with the next killer app. You are missing the point if you say “you must use our interface”.

Yahoo: Most phones doesn’t have a mouse, so the iphone is revolutionary.  Why haven’t the internet and mobile industries made love?  There’s a user interface gap. New interfaces now allow web content to be viewed. We’re at a point now where it’s just about to happen.

MTV: we’re waiting for the interactivity to finally come to fruition. Text in via mobile, as opposed to having it on your tv set remote control.  You can’t do it today because of interoperability issues, and interface issues.

Bob – Virginia tech shooting, first 20 minutes on cnn was from user-generated video. 

Yahoo - The London bombing was the seminal moment where people understood what it means to have people on the ground in real time recording the moment.  So my photos are being posted to this event automatically.  Mapping where I took the cell phone pic from, for flickr.

If I’m thinking about Heroes, I can visit that fantasy realm when I’m there in the physical world.  News will be the first frontier.  We’ve looked carefully at having viewers creating content.  The mobile phone is THE device.  Geo-aware.

Bob – but from a social standpoint this is nasty.  Your life isn’t private anymore.  Someone uses their cellphone to take a picture of you, and what if you are the latest goofball.

Media lab guy – they’re behavior recognition devices, not just phones.  You can mine market behavior, but what are the privacy implications?  It’s just like any other new domain.

Yahoo – I can see my friends went to this restaurant. Advertising gets better when you know what people want.  All phones are moving toward that point, and in a way that protects their privacy.

Turner – people of a certain age are very reticent to get ads – the younger demographic is used to it.

MTV: people who are anti-ads are bypassing traditional advertising, they go to the web just to find what they want.  Original content production is becoming the new advertising.  We’ve created programming around this.  Web junk 20, the best of ugc.  Or people submit their videos trying to get on tv with us.  The lines are blending between user generated and tv, they’re getting exposure, ina way never dreamed of.  And costs often coming down.  We acquired adam shockwave, the kid brother for comedy central, was an online-only brand.  And they have a budget for the prosumer content.

Yahoo. Media is becoming a collective map of attention, that is what media is coming.upload the picture of where you are, we’ll be able to see those places better.

Turner – I like to see people breaking the business models.  They came up with a plan in Europe where you took your data tariff with you when you were roaming.  My phone bill was $1700 after 2 weeks in japan, so I was attracted to this.  They said, bundle a slingbox, same flat rate.  That was interesting to me.  Or – call anyone you want anywhere for free, like skype.  Innovation needs to break down existing market models.  I love watching the battle google is leading with the open handset – attach to whoever you want.  Verizon has legitimate concerns about hanging any old device off a network.  But if people don’t break down the status quo we’ll never move the market forward.

Yahoo (marc davis): blick’s revenue model is just watch ads.  An exploration that’s being looked at right now.

Moderator: let’s talk about google and apple entering the field.  They’ve had nothing to do with mobile up until now.  What’s the significance… or not? They have customer goodwill and tacit sense of potential.

Bob – last year we did a billion phones. Iphones, relative to that, is nothing.  But their importance – they dictated a business model to a carrier.  18 years at Motorola, it didn’t work like that in the past.  “you’ll pay us for every phone call made”, Apple told them.  Holy night!  God love steve jobs for doing this.  You have to break the mentality.  I don’t know what to say about google.  They’re massive, they come across as the champion, but do you ever wonder how good their intentions really are?

Medialab: android is solving the right problem, but I’ll reserve judgment until I see devices in people’s hands.  The gatekeepers, how will they handle it? A year down the line we’ll have a better sense.

Yahoo –the iphone is .1% of the mobile phone market, and android hasn’t yet gotten penetration.  We’ve done things with carriers that will be on a hundred million phones in the next year.  Scale matters.  On top of that you can build businesses.  Google’s move is great for the industry.  We’re exicted to have more OS-es to work with.  Making a platform where advertising and services delivery will actually work is wonderful for us – advertising is the brass ring everyone is trying to grab.  What does this mean for content companies?  You’ll see distribution of professional content through the phone, but the biggest possibility comes from user-generated content.

William Gibson’s point – the future happens at different rates around the world – the events we see in the US, will eventually get us to the places other parts of the world have already reached.  Up to a billion people are coming online in India thru $20 phones that are text only.  These aren’t multimedia devices.

MTV: the iphone was a wakeup call.  For the first time in history of mobile industry in the US, the focus was on the user interface.  It’s not a great mobile data experience, it’s slow, but it showed that consumers care about the user interface, and they haven’t taken note of that until now.  To label things mms, sms is not user friendly.  There’s been renewed interest in user interface since the iphone came out.

Question from the audience: what about metatagging?

Marc: that’s the great thing about mobile, there’s automatic tagging. Phone knows your zip code.  Can pick up tags you set earlier.

Audience: but what about the professionally produced content?

Mtv: there’s no network standard for metatagging.

Marc Davis: This is a shift from “no one knows you’re a dog on the internet” to “real people real relationships.”  We’ve seen it happening over the past few years.

MTV: The definition of privacy is changing.  Before, people would not have considered exposing their private lives on their blog.

Bob: 99% of cell phone users will never see a nokia 95.  It’s all text.  You won’t find video processing power in a cheap phone.

Marc: you can have good voice interfaces, when bandwidth and processing power improve over time.

Bob.  Watch how long it takes do enter a url on your mobile. 

Yahoo: It’s dialup in the US.

Audience: with privacy, people don’t open up the hood.  They’re smart people who should know better. It’s a question of media literacy – should the providers be responsible for helping people learn?

Audience – can you talk about china, telecoms, privacy, the internet? (laughter)

Bob – China is fascinating – they are shooting themselves in the foot, creating their own third-generation mobile phone standard.  Hurting its evolution.  Had they adopted an existing standard they would be further along.  Now they are lagging.  When the Olympics come along, there’s a question if they will have phone service.  But they add millions a day and are the largest mobile carrier.  But for a western company, profiting from that – well, everything will have to be a joint venture.

Yahoo- we were singled out for our practices – other companies have been operating the same way.  You want to operate there, the government places constraints.  China makes it incredibly difficult.  Yahoo’s actions there were done by many other companies – which doesn’t excuse them.  As an individual I favor human rights.  But from a business pt of view it’s not an option not to operate in china.  In terms of shaping technology and mobile, you can’t ignore china as a technologist either.  It’s unavoidable to engage with china in mobile.  Not long ago it was chairman Mao and grey suits and tanks.  Now it’s a Starbucks on every corner.  Now they are trying to manage massive explosion without having it all come unhinged.  I’m not saying the way they go about things is right, but you have to understand their challenge of trying to evolve.  The more we get involved in business there, the more we will like the outcome.

Yahoo: At zonetag we’ve built a database mapping cell phone towers to zip codes.  We want to help handset makers have the right tools for deployment.

Media lab – and how you deal with this today if you’re a small size startup – how do you even get your app across these things?  It’s incredibly difficult.

Mtv: that’s not just for startups.  When it costs $1000 to port to one handset, how do you get an roi?  And then how do you have enough left over to be able to innovate and create new apps?

Moderator: what’s the next thing to watch?

MTV: companies like yahoo and google are creating a user environment within the mobile environment.  MTV will work with them to provide our content on a much larger scale than if we could only work with carriers.  Where media companies have excelled has not come to bear in the mobile space but that is changing.

Yahoo: the ability for developers to get right to the mobile platform is coming.  Creating an ecosystem that works for other parties is exciting.  The will be value creation by that 17 year old kid in his garage that will help everyone.

Media lab: more sophisticated apps to monitor and comprehend user behavior.  Accelerometry.  An app knows your walking or standing.  So how to display media?

Bob: IMS – internet protocol multimedia subsystem.  Devices have an ip address.  As more get them, as people share and use content as they move from one device to another, will be massive.  ‘were already dealing with drm issues.  How can I use that music on my computer on my handheld? Now I have to switch to the tv when I walk over there.  It will open up the communication opportunities going forward.

Write What You Know

I shouldn't look a gift horse in the mouth, but I'm disappointed with Ann Patchett's latest book "Run".  An Patchett is a really good writer.  Her prose is beautiful.  So why pick a topic that she has such a deaf ear to?

All writing classes say "write what you know."  So why is Patchett writing from the perspective of three black kids, one from the projects and the other two adopted into a rich and powerful family?  Even if she's spent the last few years with kids just like that, how can she presume to know how to represent their thoughts on class, race and discrimination?

The whole thing just rang so false to me - and believe me, I love the author.  Her prose is always lovely, but she came across sounding limited here, like she never gets out.  You don't have to speak with many people of color about discrimination before hearing the phrase "you'll never understand what it's like" (usually spoken right after you say, naively, "I know just what you mean!")  So, Ann, how about some more books about the friendship between women, the pain and glory of becoming a writer, adult relationships, career self-doubt, and grown-up families?  How about books about quests and failures and success and patience?  How about some more books about what you know because you've been there?

I recently read Maya Angelou's "Heart of a Woman" (and wrote my thesis on "Invisible Man", and have read a bit of African American fiction over the years).  Reading about the black experience from a primary voice is much, more moving and convincing.  And helps you realize that as a white person you can never know "what it feels like to be black". "Run" was a presumptuous stretch that didn't succeed.  I also wholeheartedly agree with the reviewer I. Peters "Miezekatze" on Amazon who said, "Issue is piled up upon issue and not a single one is tackled in depth".

It's a Community, Stupid!

Read my lips: Terrific post by Stuart Henshall.  Conference organizers need to learn how to leverage conference bloggers, and presenters can contribute.  PR firms should be the enablers.  Stuart tells us why and how.

My favorite quote out of many great thoughts here:

"You are managing a community, not a conference".  Conference organizers need to get this.

(via the FastForward Blog)

Jennifer Garner and Geena Davis

Anyone who is wondering whether waterboarding is torture should run out today and rent "The Long Kiss Goodnight", a 1996 thriller and favorite B movie of mine starring Geena Davis and Samuel L. Jackson.  It's got an interesting version of a waterboarding scene...

I saw a review today on the NYT website for Jennifer Garner playing Roxane in Cyrano de Bergerac (she's getting mixed reviews, but thumbs up from the Times).  Alias is one of the few TV shows I really love.  And Cyrano is one of the many plays I totally adore.  Hopefully I will get a chance to get down to NYC and see this while she's still in it.

Anyway, the banner leading people to the review looks like this:

It really reminded me of Geena Davis, so went prowling through Google images.  There is a slight resemblance.

You would never mistake Geena for Jen, but you might mistake Jen for Geena 15 years ago, with that red hair.

Here's what Geena looks like today:

And Jen:

Why OpenSocial Is so Exciting

Google has just announced that they are opening three new APIs that allow developers to access profile information, friends information and activities.

While most folks are viewing this as Google's answer to Facebook Applications, (an either brilliant or misguided answer), I see something else.

I see for the first time ever a major web player making a serious gesture toward solving the web's identity problem.  Not only the Google websites, but already LinkedIn, Friendster, Oracle, SalesForce and Ning are already on board.  If Facebook's closed system is the AOL in this equation, Google is the web.  We all know who won at first and who won in the long run!

“Obviously, we would love for them to be part of it,” Joe Kraus, director of product management at Google said of Facebook. 

Hah!

Thanks to these APIs, essential Web 3.0 functionality like universal reputation, single signon, and portable identity attributes are sure to be on the horizon.  OK, so it might be awhile before all the hard work put in over the past 4 years by people like the FOAF ers,  OpenID, Sxip, etc. finally comes to fruition here.  But to me, this signals the end of the walled garden as the only available option online.  Glory glory hallelujah!

Google Gets Microsoft's Goat

Super interesting news from Google.  Remember a few days back when everyone was wondering why Google stepped back from the Facebook acquisition and let Microsoft buy it? Viewing it as a huge win for Microsoft?  And then Sergei Brin commented that Microsoft "may have overbid"?

Well, now that Facebook has successfully brought in those dollars, Google has announced that they have the killer app to compete with Facebook: OpenSocial.

Was it sweet of Google to wait to announce this until Microsoft was committed to Facebook?  If I were Ethan Zuckerman, I would probably think so.  Was it evil of Google to wait to announce this until Microsoft was committed to Facebook?  If I were Bill Gates, I would probably think so.  But in my opinion beating Microsoft at their own ultra-competitive game is not just good business but sweet justice.  Go Google Go!

I'm blogging at MarketHum.com

I periodically blog over at MarketHum, the website for the social media marketing consultancy where I am a partner.  If you're interested in my posts here, you may want to check out some of the things I have talked about over there: How Facebook Ranks Stories, Content Management - Not So Easy After All, Your Customer Has Been Conditioned Not to Trust You, Remember those Mom and Pop Shops?, and more.

My Photo
Blog powered by TypePad

Badges

More Stuff

  • www.flickr.com
    This is a Flickr badge showing public photos from iwalcott. Make your own badge here.